- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-564/14: Action brought on 28 July 2014 — Ahmed Mohamed Saleh Baeshen v OHIM
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0564
62014TN0564
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.10.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 380/15
(Case T-564/14)
2014/C 380/20
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ahmed Mohamed Saleh Baeshen & Co. (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) (represented by: M. Vanhegan, Barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 May 2014 given in Case R 687/2014-2;
—Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The word mark ‘TEAVANA’ for services in Class 35 — Community trade mark No 4 0 98 588
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, Teavana Corporation
Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Revoked the CTM proprietor’s right in respect of Community trade mark No 4 0 98 588 in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the appeal as inadmissible
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a), 59 and 75 CTMR.