I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 352/35
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Éditions Quo Vadis (Carquefou, France) (represented by: F. Valentin, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Francisco Gómez Hernández (Jacarilla, Spain)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 July 2013 given in Case R 1166/2012-4.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘QUO VADIS’ for goods and services in Classes 29, 33 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 8 871 758
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: French trade mark No 92 422 947 for the word mark ‘QUO VADIS’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 38 and 42 and French trade mark No 1 257 750 for the word mark ‘QUO VADIS’ for goods in Class 16
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for part of the contested goods and services
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the opposition
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(5) CTMR.