EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 February 2011. # O. Fokkens. # Application for interpretation - Inadmissibility. # Case C-345/09 INT.
ECLI:EU:C:2011:57
62009CO0345
February 9, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-345/09 INT)
Application for interpretation – Inadmissibility
Procedure – Interpretation of a judgment – Application for interpretation of a preliminary ruling – Inadmissibility (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 92(1)) (see paras 3-4)
Re:
Application for interpretation of the judgment of 14 October 2010 in Case C‑345/09 Van Delft and Others.
Operative part
1.The application for interpretation is dismissed.
2.Mr Fokkens is ordered to bear his own costs.
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.