I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 53/71)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Grünig KG (Bad Kissingen, Germany) (represented by: Y. Melin and B. Vigneron, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, Article 1(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 of 25 September 2020 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in the People’s Republic of China in that the European Commission infringed Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union by imposing an anti-dumping duty in a discriminatory manner by granting an exemption on the basis of the customs procedure of end-use;
—order the European Commission and any parties intervening in support of the Commission to pay all the costs.
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging infringement of Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21) in that the contested regulation, namely Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 of 25 September 2020 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2020 L 315, p. 1) does not impose an anti-dumping duty on all imports found to be dumped and causing harm.
The applicant considers that the Commission imposed an anti-dumping duty on imports of a product in a discriminatory manner, in breach of Article 9(5) of Regulation 2016/1036 referred to above, in that it provides for an exemption from the anti-dumping duty on the basis of the customs procedure of end-use. Consequently, the provision of Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 is unlawful and should be annulled.