- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-91/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 17 February 2012 — Skatteverket v PFC Clinic AB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0091
62012CN0091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.4.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 118/19
(Case C-91/12)
2012/C 118/31
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Skatteverket
Respondent: PFC Clinic AB
Questions referred
1.Is Article 132(1)(b) and (c) of the VAT Directive to be interpreted as meaning that the stated exemption from taxation covers services such as those at issue in the present case and which consist of:
(a)cosmetic surgery,
(b)cosmetic treatments?
2.Does it affect that assessment if the surgery or treatments are carried out with the purpose of preventing or treating sicknesses, physical impairments or injuries?
3.If due account is to be taken of the purpose, can the patient’s understanding of the purpose of the intervention be taken into consideration?
4.Is it of any importance to the assessment whether the intervention is carried out by licensed medical professionals, or that such professionals decide on its purpose?
Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, p. 1).