I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 190/32)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: CSTP Azienda della Mobilità SpA (Salerno, Italy) (represented by: G. Capo and L. Visone, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the European Commission of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN), notified to the applicant on 19 February 2015, implemented by Italy;
—declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) (for EUR 4 951 838) is entirely null and void in so far as it states that the sums awarded by way of compensation for public service obligations within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, granted under Article 11 of that regulation in respect of tariff obligations in the Local Public Transport sector, could be deemed a non-notified measure constituting State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU which is incompatible with the internal market;
—declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 is entirely null and void in so far as it lays down operational measures for the recovery of aid paid by the Italian State;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-185/15 Buonotourist v Commission.