NEWModern Legal Agent: describe your case, get an answer backed by case law and a draft filing.
Try it for free
EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T -410/12: Action brought on 6 September 2012 — Vitaminaqua Ltd v OHIM

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0410

62012TN0410

September 6, 2012

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/34

(Case T -410/12)

2012/C 355/71

Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: Vitaminaqua Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Krajnyák, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Energy Brands, Inc. (New York, United States of America)

Form of order sought

—Amend the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM rejecting application No 8338592 for registration of the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ (Case R 997/2011-1) and order the registration of the trade mark in accordance with the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM, thereby conferring protection as a trade mark on the sign;

—Order the defendant or the other party to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Vitaminaqua Ltd.

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 32 (application for registration No 8 338 592).

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Energy Brands, Inc.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: inter alia the national word mark ‘VITAMINWATER’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 32.

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: decision of the Opposition Division set aside and application for registration as a Community trade mark rejected.

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia