- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T -410/12: Action brought on 6 September 2012 — Vitaminaqua Ltd v OHIM
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0410
62012TN0410
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.11.2012
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 355/34
(Case T -410/12)
2012/C 355/71
Language in which the application was lodged: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Vitaminaqua Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Krajnyák, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Energy Brands, Inc. (New York, United States of America)
Form of order sought
—Amend the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM rejecting application No 8338592 for registration of the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ (Case R 997/2011-1) and order the registration of the trade mark in accordance with the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM, thereby conferring protection as a trade mark on the sign;
—Order the defendant or the other party to bear the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Vitaminaqua Ltd.
Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘vitaminaqua’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 32 (application for registration No 8 338 592).
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Energy Brands, Inc.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: inter alia the national word mark ‘VITAMINWATER’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 32.
Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition rejected.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: decision of the Opposition Division set aside and application for registration as a Community trade mark rejected.
Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).