EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-573/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Parma (Italy) lodged on 30 October 2020 — Casa di Cura Città di Parma SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0573

62020CN0573

October 30, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

1.2.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/27

(Case C-573/20)

(2021/C 35/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Casa di Cura Città di Parma SpA

Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate

Questions referred

1.[Is there] a conflict between national legislation and [EU] law and, in particular, between Article 19(5) and Article 19bis of Presidential Decree 633/72 (the Italian national legislation which governs the mechanism for calculating the non-deductible proportion of VAT), on the one hand, and Article 17(2)(a) of Directive [77/388/EC] of 17 May 1977, (1) on the other?

2.[Is] the difference in treatment between Italian healthcare professionals, deemed to be ‘final consumers’ (liable to VAT) and healthcare professionals of other Member States of the European Union (such as Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, France and Spain), deemed to be ‘intermediary operators’ (with the right to deduct VAT), [compatible with EU law]?

3.[Is there] unequal treatment as regards the rules on VAT between the various Member States of the European Union, given that unlike the situation in Italy where healthcare services are exempt from VAT, in other Member States of the European Union (Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, France and Spain) the same healthcare services are subject to VAT, with the result that different rates of VAT and, therefore, a different right to deduct are applied to the same healthcare services?

4.[Is] the inequality between Italian healthcare professionals (including Casa di Cura Città di Parma) and the professionals of other Member States of the European Union (Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Greece, France and Spain) — in that the healthcare services provided by the latter are subject to value added tax and, as a result, unlike Italian healthcare professionals, they have the corresponding right to deduct and/or to reimbursement of VAT paid on purchases — [compatible with EU law]?

(1) Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia