- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-619/22, Sinda & V R: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Zemgales rajona tiesa — Latvia) — SIA ‘Sinda & V R’ v Rīgas domes Satiksmes departaments (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Requirement to set out the relationship between the provisions of European Union law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CB0619
62022CB0619
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/4
(Case C-619/22, (1) Sinda & V R)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to provide the legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Requirement to set out the relationship between the provisions of European Union law of which an interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 189/04)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: SIA ‘Sinda & V R’
Defendant: Rīgas domes Satiksmes departaments
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Zemgales rajona tiesa (District Court, Zemgale, Latvia), by decision of 20 September 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
Date lodged: 27.9.2022.