I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 245/42)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. de Juan Casadevall, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
—annul the contested decision;
—in the alternative, if the main claim is rejected, annul the contested decision insofar as it does not limit the recovery order to indirect acquisitions made after 21 December 2007, and does not recognise the right to full application of tax concessions during the entire period provided for in Article 12.5 of the Royal Legislative Decree 4/2004 of 5 March approving the Texto Refundido de la Ley del Impuesto sobre Sociedades (the consolidated text of the Spanish Company Tax Act), and
—order the European Commission to bear the costs.
The contested decision in these proceedings is the same as that in Cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission, and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and others v Commission.
The pleas and main arguments relied on are similar to those already raised in those cases.
It is claimed in particular that there was an error in law in the application of the selectivity criterion, that there was a misuse of powers and an infringement of the principles of equality and legitimate expectations.