- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-508/23: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Medspa v EUIPO – Hic (ALDO COPPOLA AMO) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ALDO COPPOLA AMO – Earlier national word marks and earlier international registration of word mark MIAMO – Earlier national figurative mark and earlier international registration of figurative mark MIAMO Healthy Skin System – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0508
62023TA0508
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/7166
9.12.2024
(Case T-508/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark ALDO COPPOLA AMO - Earlier national word marks and earlier international registration of word mark MIAMO - Earlier national figurative mark and earlier international registration of figurative mark MIAMO Healthy Skin System - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/7166)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Medspa Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Baghetti, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hic Srl (Milan) (represented by: A. Mascetti and G. Beltrame, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 June 2023 (Case R 1625/2022-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Medspa Srl to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: Italian.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7166/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—