I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 213/69)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Aurora Srl (Padova, Italy) (represented by: L.-B. Buchman, lawyer)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SESVanderhave NV (Tienen, Belgium)
Proprietor of the Community plant variety right at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community plant variety right at issue: Community Plant Variety Right No. EU 15118, sugar beet variety M 02205
Procedure before CPVO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 27 February 2019 in Case R A010/2013-RENV
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that the contested decision misapplied the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 November 2017 in case T-140/15;
—alter the contested decision, reverse CPVO Decision NN010 of 23 September 2013 and validate the challenge to the validity of CPVR No. EU 15118 raised by the applicant on 28 August 2012;
and as a consequence:
—declare that CPVR No. EU 15118 is ab initio null and void;
—order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, including the costs of any intervening parties.
—Violation of the principles of legal certainty and legitimate expectations;
—Dereliction of duty and denial of justice.