I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case C-773/22)
(2023/C 54/20)
Language of the case: Slovak
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati, R. Lindenthal and M. Mataija, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Slovak Republic
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that, by failing to transpose correctly into its legal order Article 2(3), the first subparagraph of Article 6(b), Articles 7(4), 14(1) and (4), 35(3), 41(1)(c), 42(2)(a), (c), (f) and (j), 50(1), read in conjunction with Annex VII, point 1(d), and Article 55a(2) of Directive 2005/36/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications, the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions of the directive,
—order the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.
The deadline for transposition of Directive 2005/36/EC expired on 20 October 2007 and the deadline for transposition of Directive 2013/55/EU (2) amending Directive 2005/36/EC expired on 18 January 2016. The Slovak Republic has incorrectly transposed or failed to transpose Article 2(3); the first subparagraph of Article 6(b); Article 7(4); Article 14(1) and (4); Article 35(3); Article 41(1)(c); Article 42(2); Article 50(1), read in conjunction with Annex VII, point 1(d) and Article 55a(2) of Directive 2005/36/EC.
(1) OJ 2005 L 255, p. 22.
(2) Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Market Information System (OJ 2013 L 354, p. 132).