I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-22/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Qualität hat Zukunft - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 26/84
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Fomanu AG (Neustadt an der Waldnaab, Germany) (represented by: T. Raible, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2011 (Case R 1518/2011-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Qualität hat Zukunft as a Community trade mark.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Fomanu AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2013026EN.01004401-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2013026EN.01004401-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.