- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-190/11: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Daniela Mühlleitner v Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi (Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 15(1)(c) — Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CA0190
62011CA0190
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.11.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 355/6
(Case C-190/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 15(1)(c) - Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts)
2012/C 355/08
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Daniela Mühlleitner
Defendants: Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi
Re:
Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 15(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts
Operative part of the judgment
Article 15(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as not requiring the contract between the consumer and the trader to be concluded at a distance.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.
* * *
Language of the case: German.