- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1147/23: Action brought on 8 December 2023 — AR v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1147
62023TN1147
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/2044
18.3.2024
(Case T-1147/23)
(C/2024/2044)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: AR (represented by: M. Conil-Séon, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of 31 January 2023;
—order the defendant to pay compensation to the applicant in the amount of EUR 5 000 ex aequo et bono;
—order the defendant to pay all of the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action against the decision of the European Commission of 31 January 2023 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of open competition EPSO/AD/376/20 — Greek-language lawyer-linguists, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging loss of the chance of receiving more points in the translation test on account of an irregularity in the communication of the instructions.
2.Second plea in law, alleging a substantive error and a failure to treat the candidates in an equal manner in the absence of the points from the multiple choice test being taken into consideration in the applicant’s overall score.
3.Third plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principle of legitimate expectations and referring to multiple assurances that he had been successful in the preliminary tests.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2044/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)