I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Pirelli Tyre SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Caneva and G. Fucci, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Design at issue: Community design (Tyre treads) — Community design No 4 692-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 January 2015 in Case R 1286/2014-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—grant the application for restitutio in integrum made by Pirelli Tyre SpA in accordance with Article 67 of Regulation No 6/2002/EC on Community designs, by declaring that the payment of the renewal fee relating to the second five-year period by way of a withdrawal from current account No 000069 under the name of Bugnion SpA is lawful and that, therefore, the right to the design at issue is still valid;
—order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Pirelli Tyre SpA in the present proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 67 of Regulation No 6/2002/EC on Community designs.