EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-540/23: Action brought on 29 August 2023 — Sandhold v EUIPO — Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis (PATAPOUF)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0540

62023TN0540

August 29, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/223

(Case T-540/23)

(C/2023/223)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Sandhold BV (Leiden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Spiegeler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PATAPOUF — Application for registration No 18 445 273

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 June 2023 in Case R 2553/2022-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

order EUIPO to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by Sandhold B.V.;

order Grupo de Bodegas Vinartis, S.A. to bear its own costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the definition of the ‘relevant public’ for the likelihood of confusion;

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the assessment of the likelihood of confusion by refusing to proceed to the conceptual comparison and not taking into consideration the high reputation of the product associated with the earlier trade mark.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/223/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia