- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-483/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu (Poland) lodged on 24 July 2018 — Profi Credit Polska S.A., whose seat is in Bielsko-Biała, v OH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0483
62018CN0483
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.11.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 427/7
(Case C-483/18)
(2018/C 427/11)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Profi Credit Polska S.A., whose seat is in Bielsko-Biała
Respondent: OH
Question referred
Should Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, in particular Article 3(1) and (2), Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) thereof, and Directive 2008/48/EC of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC, in particular Article 22(3) thereof, be interpreted as precluding an interpretation of Article 10, in conjunction with Article 17, of the ustawa z dnia 28 kwietnia 1936 r. prawo wekslowe (Law of 28 April 1936 on Bills of Exchange and Promissory Notes) according to which a court is not permitted to act of its own motion in a situation where it has a strong and justified belief, based on materials not originating from the parties to the case, that the contract giving rise to the basic legal relationship is at least partially invalid, and the applicant pursues his claim under a blank promissory note while the defendant raises no pleas and behaves passively?
Language of the case: Polish.
* * *
(1) OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
(2) OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.