I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2019/C 122/24)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Rot Front OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: M. Geitz and J. Stock, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kiev, Ukraine)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark РОШЕН — International registration designating the European Union No 11 233 784
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 in Case R 1872/2018-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Articles 94(1), 47(5) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.