I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
17.6.2024
(C/2024/3627)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: SMT GmbH (Reutlingen, Germany) (represented by: T. Seifried, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gerrit Pies (Solingen, Germany), Wolfgang Rixen (Solingen)
Proprietors of the design at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design ‘Building materials’ – Community design No 222 070-0006
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 March 2024 in Case R 2163/2022-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
—Infringement of the first sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 4(1) and Article 6(1)(b), of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 8(1), of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 8(2), of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)(b), of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3627/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *