- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-400/15: Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0400
62015TN0400
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.9.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/35
(Case T-400/15)
(2015/C 320/52)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Ana Isabel Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto (Algés, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pita Negrão, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: University College London (London, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘CITRUS SATURDAY’ — Application for registration No 11 789 195
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 April 2015 in Case R 2109/2014-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—consider the appeal admissible;
—declare null and void the contested decision;
—remit the case to the Opposition Division of the Office for further prosecution.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of the Community trade mark regulations;
—Infringement of principles of the EC law.