- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2012.#Mojo Concerts BV and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV v European Commission.#State aid – Action for annulment – Investment of the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy’ complex – Decision finding that there was no State aid – Applicants not individually concerned – Inadmissibility.#Case T-90/09.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:30
62009TO0090
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-90/09)
Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision closing an aid proceeding – Competitor of the aid recipient – Right to bring an action – Conditions (Arts 88(2) EC and 230, fourth para., EC) (see paras 30-34)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6018 final of 21 October 2008 on the investment made by the Gemeente Rotterdam in the Ahoy’ complex (State aid C 4/2008 (ex N 97/2007, ex CP 91/2007)).
Operative part
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Mojo Concerts BV and Amsterdam Music Dome Exploitatie BV are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, the Gemeente Rotterdam and Ahoy’ Rotterdam NV.
3.The Kingdom of the Netherlands is ordered to bear its own costs.