I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition EPSO/AD/402/23 - Rules on language - Discrimination based on language - Restriction of the choice of Language 2 to English - Amending notice - Possibility of sitting the tests in any of the 24 official languages of the European Union - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2024/6436)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: French Republic (represented by: T. Stéhelin, B. Fodda, S. Royon and B. Travard, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Niddam, acting as Agent)
Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, M. Van Regemorter and S. Baeyens, acting as Agents), Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent), and Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: A. Germeaux and T. Schell, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the French Republic seeks the annulment of Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/402/23, entitled ‘Administrators (AD 6) in the following fields: 1. Microeconomics/macroeconomics, 2. Financial economics, 3. Industrial economics’ (OJ 2023 C 220 A, p. 1).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The French Republic and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs.
3.The Kingdom of Belgium, the Italian Republic and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg shall each bear their own costs.
—
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6436/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
*