I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Customs union - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Article 211(6) - Authorisation for inward processing of certain grain-oriented electrical steel products - Risk of adverse effect on the essential interests of EU producers - Examination of the economic conditions - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 - Article 259 - European Commission’s conclusion on the economic conditions - Article 263 TFEU - Act not open to challenge)
(2021/C 228/02)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH, thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo (represented by: M. Günes and L.C. Heinisch, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal in Case C-572/18 P;
2.Orders thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel GmbH and thyssenkrupp Electrical Steel Ugo, in addition to bearing their own costs, to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.