- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1091/23: Action brought on 22 November 2023 — Freddo Freddo v EUIPO — Krema (doffre)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1091
62023TN1091
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2024/753
(Case T-1091/23)
(C/2024/753)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Freddo Freddo, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.F. Gallego Jiménez, E. Sanz Valls, P. Bauzá Martínez and Y. Hernández Viñes, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Krema S.A. (Punta del Este, Uruguay)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark doffre — Application for registration No 18 365 318
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2023 in Case R 744/2023-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—uphold the opposition filed against the contested mark and declare that it is impossible for the conflicting marks to coexist peacefully;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/753/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *