EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-364/24: Action brought on 18 July 2024 – Wycon v EUIPO – GPQ (WIQO)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0364

62024TN0364

July 18, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5243

(Case T-364/24)

(C/2024/5243)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Wycon SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: G. Ghidini, M. Mergati and C. Signorini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: GPQ Srl (Milan)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark WIQO – International registration designating the European Union No 10 644 219

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 May 2024 in Joined Cases R 691/2023-4 and R 772/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

vary the contested decision since it was found in that decision that the mark was not to be revoked for lack of use in relation to ‘cosmetic preparations for skin care’ in Class 3;

vary the contested decision since it was found in that decision that the mark was not to be revoked for lack of use in relation to ‘make-up products’ in Class 3;

order the adverse parties to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Misapplication of Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5243/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia