EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2009. # Japan Tobacco Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(5) - Detriment done to the distinctive character of the earlier mark - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark - Likelihood - Application for registration of the figurative sign ‘CAMELO’ as a Community trade mark - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word and figurative marks CAMEL. # Case C-136/08 P.

ECLI:EU:C:2009:282

62008CO0136

April 30, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C‑136/08 P)

Appeal – Community trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(5) – Detriment done to the distinctive character of the earlier mark – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Likelihood – Application for registration of the figurative sign ‘CAMELO’ as a Community trade mark – Opposition by the proprietor of the national word and figurative marks CAMEL

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark having a reputation (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(5)) (see paras 28, 39, 43-44)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment in Case T‑128/06 Japan Tobacco v OHIM and Torrefacçao Camelo by which that Court dismissed the action brought by the appellant for annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 February 2006 relating to opposition proceedings between Japan Tobacco and Torrefacçao Camelo – Infringement of Article 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) – Relative grounds for refusal to register a trade mark – Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character of an earlier trade mark, or detrimental to that distinctive character.

Operative part:

1.The appeal is dismissed.

2.Japan Tobacco, Inc. is ordered to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia