- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-68/22: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2023 — Granini France v EUIPO — Pichler (Joro) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Joro — Earlier national word mark JOKO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0068
62022TA0068
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/44
(Case T-68/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Joro - Earlier national word mark JOKO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 252/51)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Granini France (Mâcon, France) (represented by: J. Wachsmuth, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and D. Gája, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Josef Pichler (San Leonardo in Passiria, Italy)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2021 (Case R 2336/2020-1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2021 (Case R 2336/2020-1);
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.