- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-539/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 March 2021 — Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet v Commission (Arbitration clause — Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) — ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Govern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts — Debit notes — Eligible costs — Justification of the costs — Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0539
62018TA0539
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 163/24
(Case T-539/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Arbitration clause - Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) - ‘Highly scalable Deployment model of Inclusive E-Govern’ (DIEGO) and ‘Speeding Every European Digital’ (SEED) contracts - Debit notes - Eligible costs - Justification of the costs - Reliability of records of tasks carried out for the projects)
(2021/C 163/29)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet (Quart de Poblet, Spain) (represented by: B. Sanchis Piqueras and J. A. Rodríguez Pellitero, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 272 TFEU seeking, in essence, a declaration that the Commission’s alleged contractual claims against the applicant under the DIEGO and SEED grant agreements are non-existent.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ayuntamiento de Quart de Poblet to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 427, 26.11.2018.