I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
()
(2010/C 288/105)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Ecologistas en Acción — CODA (represented by: J. Ramos Segarra, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant association challenges the decision refusing its request for access to certain documents submitted by Spain in the investigation concerning EU-PILOT-ENVI 72409, which is intended to implement the Special Protection and Internal Reform Plan (PEPRI) for the district of Cabanyal in the City of Valencia, approved by the Ayuntamiento de Valencia and the Generalidad de Valencia.
In support of its forms of order the applicant claims that the contested decision infringes Articles 3, 4 and 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006. (<a id="ntc1-C_2010288EN.01005701-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2010288EN.01005701-E0001">(1)</a>
The applicant states in that regard that, contrary to the Commission’s submissions, there are no domestic legal proceedings clearly connected to the procedure initiated by the Commission. The legal proceedings to which the defendant refers concern non-compliance with domestic laws which do not in any way regulate the environment or refer to the environmental impact assessment.
Further, the applicant takes the view that, in any event, the disclosure of the information requested cannot prejudice the environmental protection to which that information refers.
Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies (OJ 2006 L 264, p. 13).