- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-218/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken (Germany), lodged on 10 May 2012 — Lokman Emrek v Vlado Sabranovic
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0218
62012CN0218
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.8.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 243/3
(Case C-218/12)
2012/C 243/04
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Lokman Emrek
Respondent: Vlado Sabranovic
Questions referred
1.In cases in which a trader’s internet presence satisfies the ‘directing’ requirement, does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 require, as a further unwritten condition, that the consumer was induced to enter into the contract by the website operated by the trader and consequently that the internet presence must be a causal factor in regard to the conclusion of the contract?
2.In so far as a causal link between the ‘directing’ requirement and the conclusion of the contract is necessary: does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 also require that the contract was concluded as a distance contract?
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).