EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-91/24, Aucroix: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 6 February 2024 – Criminal proceedings against HL

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0091

62024CN0091

February 6, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/3151

21.5.2024

(Case C-91/24, Aucroix)

(C/2024/3151)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceeding

Procureur général de Mons

Question referred

Where the courts of a Member State executing a European arrest warrant have found that, in the event of the surrender of the requested person to the issuing Member State, there is a risk of that person’s fundamental rights being infringed in connection with the execution of the foreign sentence, with the consequence that there are grounds for refusing to execute the European arrest warrant, must Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2) be interpreted as requiring those courts of the executing State to examine – in order to avoid a situation where the requested person who is a national of or resides in that State might remain unpunished – whether it is appropriate to order, in accordance with the provision transposing the abovementioned Article 4(6) into national law, that the custodial sentence imposed on the person concerned in the Member State that issued the European arrest warrant, which is referred to in that warrant, be served in the executing Member State?

(1) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

(2) OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3151/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia