I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases C-366/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2010/18/EU - Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave - National legislation making the granting of parental leave conditional on a reduction in working time, with a proportional reduction in pay - Shift work with variable hours - Request of the worker to perform his work at a fixed schedule to care for his minor children - Directive 2006/54/EC - Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in employment and occupation - Indirect discrimination - Partial inadmissibility)
(2019/C 399/15)
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant): José Manuel Ortiz Mesonero
Defendant: UTE Luz Madrid Centro
Council Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC must be interpreted as not applying to national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a worker’s right, in order to take direct care of minors or dependent family members, to reduce his ordinary hours of work, with a proportional reduction in his salary, without being able, when his usual work system is in shifts with a variable schedule, to benefit from a fixed working schedule while maintaining his ordinary hours of work.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 294, 20.08.2018.