- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-593/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 13 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — Belgium) — NY v Herios SARL (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 86/653/EEC — Article 17(2)(a) — Self-employed commercial agents — Termination of the agency contract by the principal — Compensation of the agent — Goodwill indemnity — Sub-agency — Right of the subagent to a proportion of the goodwill indemnity payable to the main agent corresponding to the customers brought by the subagent)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0593
62021CA0593
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/13
(Case C-593/21) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 86/653/EEC - Article 17(2)(a) - Self-employed commercial agents - Termination of the agency contract by the principal - Compensation of the agent - Goodwill indemnity - Sub-agency - Right of the subagent to a proportion of the goodwill indemnity payable to the main agent corresponding to the customers brought by the subagent)
(2022/C 463/16)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: NY
Defendant: Herios SARL
Operative part of the judgment
Article 17(2)(a) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents,
must be interpreted as meaning that the goodwill indemnity which has been paid by the principal to the main agent in respect of the customer base brought by the subagent is capable of constituting, for the main agent, a substantial benefit. However, the payment of a goodwill indemnity to the subagent may be regarded as not being equitable, within the meaning of that provision, where the subagent continues his or her commercial agency business in relation to the same clients and for the same products but in the context of a direct relationship with the main principal, which replaced the main agent that had previously engaged him or her.
(*) Language of the case: French.