I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Interim relief - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to the EMA’s scientific advice given pursuant to Article 57(1)(n) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Decision to grant a third party access to the documents - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(C/2025/2557)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Teva Pharma BV (Haarlem, Netherlands) (represented by: C. Lindenthal and A. Säurig, lawyers)
Defendant: European Medicines Agency (represented by: G. Gavriilidou, S. Drosos and G. Ramo, acting as Agents)
By its application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, the applicant seeks suspension of the operation of Decision EMA/391476/2024 Rev.1 of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of 28 October 2024 granting a third party, under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to a document relating to scientific advice concerning the medicinal product ferric carboxymaltose, subject to certain redactions.
The application for interim measures is dismissed.
The order of 30 December 2024, Teva Pharma v EMA (T-666/24 R), is cancelled.
The costs are reserved.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2557/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—