- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-602/19: Action brought on 3 September 2019 – Eugene Perma France v EUIPO – SPI Investments Group (NATURANOVE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0602
62019TN0602
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.10.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 363/29
—
(Case T-602/19)
(2019/C 363/38)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Eugene Perma France (Saint-Denis, France) (represented by: S. Havard Duclos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SPI Investments Group, SL (Sant Just Desvern, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark NATURANOVE – Application for registration No 17 007 949
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 in Case R 2161/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the appeal against the Opposition Division’s decision based on Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and ordered the Applicant to bear the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings, fixed to the amount of EUR 1 170;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—