I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-567/14)(1)
((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union figurative mark GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL - Earlier, non-registered national figurative marks GROUP Company TOURISM & TRAVEL - Relative ground for refusal - Application of national law - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence establishing the content of the national right - Rule 19(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Failure to take account of evidence adduced before the Board of Appeal - Discretion of the Board of Appeal - Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009))
(2016/C 305/39)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Applicant: Group OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: D. Dragiev and A. Andreev, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, P. Ivanov and D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Kosta Iliev (Sofia) (represented by: S. Ganeva, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2014 (Case R 1587/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Group OOD and Mr Iliev.
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 June 2014 (Case R 1587/2013-4).
2.Orders EUIPO and Mr Kosta Iliev to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by Group OOD.
(1)
OJ C 372, 20.10.2014.