I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Piekarnia i Kawiarnia Lajkonik - Lack of genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/2863)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Lorenz Switzerland AG, successor in law to Leithart AG Schweiz (Appenzell, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Wittwer, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lajkonik Alkohole Łukasz Bylica (Wieliczka, Poland) (represented by: P. Dykas, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 10 July 2024 (Case R 1916/2023-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Lorenz Switzerland AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Lajkonik Alkohole Łukasz Bylica;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/6268, 28.10.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2863/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—