- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-243/10: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Rungis express AG v OHIM — Žito (MARESTO) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0243
62010TB0243
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 336/21
(Case T-243/10)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 336/42
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Rungis express AG (Meckenheim, Germany) (represented: initially by U. Feldmann and subsequently by O. Dimopoulou, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, R. Pethke and D. Botis, agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: M. Praviček, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2010 (Case R 691/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Žito prehrambena industrija d.d. and Rungis express AG.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and the intervener are ordered to bear their own costs and, each of them, to bear half of the defendant’s costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.