- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-476/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Cirsa Italia SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0476
62020CN0476
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 28/12
(Case C-476/20)
(2021/C 28/17)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Cirsa Italia SpA
Respondent: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
Questions referred
1.Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?
2.Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?