I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
C/2024/4471
22.7.2024
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark FOOTWARE - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Admissibility of new evidence - Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)
(C/2024/4471)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nike Innovate CV (Beaverton, Oregon, United States) (represented by: K. Sandberg, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, T. Klee and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and L. Goller, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 January 2023 (Case R 2173/2021-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nike Innovate CV to pay the costs.
—
OJ C 155, 2.5.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4471/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *