- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-415/11: Action brought on 1 August 2011 — Hartmann v OHIM (Nutriskin Protection Complex)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0415
62011TN0415
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.10.2011
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 298/21
(Case T-415/11)
2011/C 298/38
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim an der Brenz, Germany) (represented by N. Aicher, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 May 2011 in Case R 1524/2010-1;
—order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal procedure before OHIM.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: Wordmark ‘Nutriskin Protection Complex’ for Goods in Classes 3 and 5 — Application for registration Number 8 995 086.
Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the Community trade mark application ‘Nutriskin Protection Complex’ in respect of the goods in Classes 3 and 5 is neither descriptive nor lacking in any distinctive character, because first the component ‘Nutriskin’ by reason of the unusual nature of the combination leads to a term, which creates no directly descriptive impression and because secondly the defendant did no more than infer the alleged lack of distinctive character from the descriptive significance of the registered trade mark.