I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 257/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: BB Services GmbH (Flörsheim am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU three-dimensional mark (Shape of a toy figure with a protrusion on the head) — EU trade mark No 50 450
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2022 in Case R 1355/2021-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and declare EU trade mark No 50 450 invalid;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.