- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FB0071
62009FB0071
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/28
(Case F-71/09) (*)
(Staff case - Officials - Action manifestly unfounded - Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 - Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations - Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Classification - Multiplication factor - Promotion points)
(2012/C 138/58)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Paolo Caminiti (Tubize, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the defendant’s decision to classify the applicant in Grade AST 9, step 4, with a multiplication factor equal to 1 and, consequently, the reinstatement of the applicant in Grade AST 9, step 2, retaining a multiplication factor of 1,071151.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law.
2.Mr Caminiti is ordered to refund to the Civil Service Tribunal the sum of EUR 500 under Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure.
3.Mr Caminiti shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the Commission.
(*)
Language of the case: French.
* * *
(1) OJ C 244, 10.10.2009, p. 17.