I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-219/13) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((State aid - Municipal real estate tax - Exemption granted to non-commercial entities carrying out specific activities - Codified law on income tax - Exemption from the one-off municipal tax - Decision in part finding no State aid and in part declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Whether directly concerned - Admissibility - Absolute impossibility of recovering the aid - Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))
(2016/C 392/24)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Pietro Ferraci (San Cesareo, Italy) (represented initially by: A. Nucara and E. Gambaro, and subsequently by E. Gambaro, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and D. Grespan, and subsequently by G. Conte, D. Grespan and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri and G. De Bellis, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Decision 2013/284/EU of 19 December 2012 on State aid SA.20829 (C 26/2010, ex NN 43/2010 (ex CP 71/2006)); Scheme concerning the municipal real estate tax exemption granted to real estate used by non-commercial entities for specific purposes implemented by Italy (OJ 2013 L 166, p. 24).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Pietro Ferracci to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs relating to its intervention.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 164, 8.6.2013.