I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2216)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Antimo Caputo Srl (Naples, Italy) (represented by: F. Musella, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and R. Raponi, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Pasquale Barbato (Villanova De Bellis, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 October 2023 (Case R 2068/2022-5).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/1548, 26.2.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2216/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—