I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark RolandGarros SPORTSWEAR – Previous national word mark Roland Garros – Late payment of the appeal fees – Decision of the Board of Appeal deeming the action to be unfounded
Community trade mark – Procedural provisions – Notification – Defects in service (Commission Regulation No 2868/95, Art. 1, Rule 68) (see paras 30-33)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2007 (Case R 876/2006-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Fédération française de tennis (FFT) and Mr Dimitrios Kaloudis.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark RolandGarros SPORTSWEAR for goods in Class 25 – Application No 3114477
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Fédération française de tennis (FFT)
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
National word mark Roland Garros for goods in Classes 3, 16, 18, 22, 25, 28, 32, 41 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal deemed non-existent for delay in paying the appeal fee
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as being in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible.
2.Orders Mr Dimitrios Kaloudis to pay the costs.