EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-98/24: Action brought on 20 February 2024 — Osculati v EUIPO — Olymp Bezner (O)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0098

62024TN0098

February 20, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2452

(Case T-98/24)

(C/2024/2452)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Osculati Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Bacchini, M. Mazzitelli, E. Rondinelli and L. Seri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Olymp Bezner KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark O — International registration designating the European Union No 1 631 210

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2023 in Case R 838/2023-4 corrected by corrigendum of 11 January 2024

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

uphold the opposition decision by which the opposition was rejected;

order EUIPO and Olymp Bezner KG to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceeding before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 102 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, also in conjunction with Article 59(2) of Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal;

Infringement of Article 102 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, also in conjunction with Article 59(1) of Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal;

Infringement of Article 102 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, also in conjunction with Article 59 of Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal;

Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, also in conjunction with Article 54(1) of Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal, and infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2452/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia