19.7.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/50

(Case T-314/21)

(2021/C 289/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: TA (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present action admissible;

—order the annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for 2019 and, in so far as necessary, the annulment of Mr Welle’s decision of 29 March 2021 in response to the complaint within the meaning of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

—order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), Article 5(2) and Article 6(11) of the internal rules on the application of the general provisions for implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations, and infringement of Articles 15(2) and 87(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union. The applicant submits, in particular, that, by failing to take into account the absence of objectives set for 2019, the assessors disregarded the abovementioned provisions.

2.Second plea in law, alleging material inaccuracies in the facts which gave rise to a manifest error of assessment.